I saw this posted so i wanted to see what your views were.
Should the ability to see the opponents deck in game be removed? If you vote yes, explain why and if you vote no explain why.

Personally I think it should be removed so it becomes harder to predict a person strat. It is too easy to tell what they are doing and what units they will have when you can see the deck.

I think more strats will become viable if you can take someone off guard.

So i voted YES. Remove it.

__________________
http://www.lfpm.org/img/wc06/England.gif
http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/5...rsig2qc2bn.gif
Jokes/Entertainment of the Week Thread Series:
WTF?! | Video/Animation | Games | Owned | Pranks | Commercial

W E E K L Y D E B A T E

yeh remove it

__________________
http://www.aoe3-arena.com/sign2/BMC_Im0rTal_,11,2.png

yes cuz like for germans its easy to tell if they merc rushing
and easy to tell strats for alot other civis

__________________
http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/7...testsig1hc.gif

yes because if they have something that the can use then the other player can counter that with a better unit so then it all goes wrong and in a big kuffufle

__________________
http://www.mastersgames.de/esostats/...oOoIYI,0,8.png

Seeing your opponents deck is an advantage. I dont mind if my opponent sees my deck because my decks are usually loose (My strategies are vaguely portrayed in my decks except when I play Ottoman :P ). Although if you look at your opponents deck, you can easily tell what he is going to do. You can tell whether he will rush or boom, and it also gives you an idea of what your opponent may use to attack you. Its a two-way street, advantage for both. If that option were removed, you may not know what to prepare for.

__________________
"If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves." - Joseph Stalin