The GameRankings average, last time I checked, was 5.7 for Coded Arms. As the first PSP first-person shooter, I think people are being a little too thick-headed and unfair in their Coded Arms reviews. I bought the game on release and up to this point, I agree in every way with psp.ign.com's review of the game. They gave it a 7.0 and pinpoint the same problems that I'm having.

If you were planning on getting Coded Arms, get it. It'll probably be worth your time. And my review's coming soon.

Hw are the controls, though? I know how you control it, but is it very comfortable using the face buttons to aim?

__________________
Hmm KOGs Alive and kicking again what can we say we had our break now we back to rock your worlds starting with the tourneys, see ya there im in SG, CBA, AA

Here's the deal on the handheld reviews, as I see it. Handhelds as
devices are meant for people who have some free time i.e. waiting in
airports, in a doctor/dentist's reception room, between classes. The
games that work best work because:
1) You can play it for 10 minutes and save.
2)Simple, intuitive play--determined by a handheld's limited control
schemes.

The problem with "professional" reviews are that they're comparing
handheld games with straight-up console games and, gee, guess
what? They find games like Coded Arms "a good effort," or "close,
but not good enough." That's bull. Konami built a game without a lot
of depth, granted. But after getting the controls where you want
them, it's fun. Fun is the point.

I played, I'm now playing in Inifinity Mode, I like it, it's perfect for my busy life, and exactly what I want in a portable game.

Have you seen this? What do you think?
http://www.usvgl.com/codedarms/codedarmsra...ge=pistol_range

__________________
http://board.daves-website.co.uk/uploads/photo-550.jpg

i personaly thought this game sucked.

__________________
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2167/kikazxk2.gif